US Medical Whistleblowers And The COVID “Vaccine” (NANO NANO)
October 9, 2020“Testing, Tracing, Treatment?” (CONTACT TRACER WHISTLE BLOWS)
October 11, 2020Publisher’s Note: The US MSM is working overtime – witness this new article with cherry picked data from NATURE magazine – to convince Team Human that mandating masks is an effective protocol for “suppressing” the “transmission” of COVID-19. This, despite overwhelming evidence (including OSHA, WHO, NIH/Fauci) that masks are both ineffective at suppressing viral transmission and harmful to otherwise healthy humans, as we have argued, with twenty years of peer-reviewed science, at Vermont Independent since last spring. Vermont Republican governor Phil Scott believes otherwise, and rather than adopting a “Masks By Choice” policy, Vermont state leadership has chosen (for the moment) to mandate mask wearing, creating a host of problems for Vermonters, including the recent full year “bus banning” of a 9-year-old Vermont Monroe School 5th grader for dropping his mask below his nose long enough to enjoy a mint shared with him by a friend. #WTF, Vermont?
For those Vermonters who still need convincing re: the dangerous ridiculousness of mask mandates, here are Tammy Clark and Kristen Meghan—two long-experienced, OSHA-certified PPE experts, who know far more about masks and ventilators than doctors, who rely on them to be outfitted properly—explaining in depth why mask mandates are incredibly UNhealthy: (1) because masks and ventilators offer NO protection against respiratory viruses, and (2) because those face coverings are downright harmful for many reasons. These two Michiganders first made a splash online in July with a video in which they explained the perverseness of Governor Whitmer’s top down one-size-fits-all mask mandate – Del Bigtree’s new interview with them on “The High Wire” makes for vital viewing, as here they tell their necessary truth before a larger audience. Please watch this video, and send it far and wide, before too many more people—especially children—are too stupefied and/or sickened by those needless muzzles to grasp this urgent information.
Highlights:
“The rebreathing of our exhaled air will without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the human brain is very sensitive to oxygen depravation. There are nerve cells for example in the hippocampus, that can’t be longer than 3 minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive. The acute warning symptoms are headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of the reaction time – reactions of the cognitive system.
However, when you have chronic oxygen depravation, all of those symptoms disappear, because you get used to it. But your efficiency will remain impaired and the undersupply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress.
We know that neurodegenerative diseases take years to decades to develop. If today you forget your phone number, the breakdown in your brain would have already started 20 or 30 years ago.
While you’re thinking, that you have gotten used to wearing your mask and rebreathing your own exhaled air, the degenerative processes in your brain are getting amplified as your oxygen deprivation continues.
The second problem is that the nerve cells in your brain are unable to divide themselves normally. So in case our governments will generously allow as to get rid of the masks and go back to breathing oxygen freely again in a few months, the lost nerve cells will no longer be regenerated. What is gone is gone.
[..]I do not wear a mask, I need my brain to think. I want to have a clear head when I deal with my patients, and not be in a carbon dioxide induced anaesthesia.
[..]There is no unfounded medical exemption from face masks because oxygen deprivation is dangerous for every single brain. It must be the free decision of every human being whether they want to wear a mask that is absolutely ineffective to protect themselves from a virus.
For children and adolescents, masks are an absolute no-no. Children and adolescents have an extremely active and adaptive immune system and they need a constant interaction with the microbiome of the Earth. Their brain is also incredibly active, as it is has so much to learn. The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain is thirsting for oxygen. The more metabolically active the organ is, the more oxygen it requires. In children and adolescents every organ is metabolically active.
To deprive a child’s or an adolescent’s brain from oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, is not only dangerous to their health, it is absolutely criminal. Oxygen deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.
The child needs the brain to learn, and the brain needs oxygen to function. We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple, indisputable physiology. Conscious and purposely induced oxygen deficiency is an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and an absolute medical contraindication.
An absolute medical contraindication in medicine means that this drug, this therapy, this method or measure should not be used – is not allowed to be used. To coerce an entire population to use an absolute medical contraindication by force, there must be definite and serious reasons for this, and the reasons must be presented to competent interdisciplinary and independent bodies to be verified and authorised.
When in ten years, dementia is going to increase exponentially, and the younger generations couldn’t reach their god-given potential, it won’t help to say “we didn’t need the masks”.
[..]How can a veterinarian, a software distributer, a business man, an electrical car manufacturer and a physicist decided on matters regarding the health of the entire population? Please dear colleagues, we all have to wake up.
I know how damaging oxygen depravation is for the brain, cardiologist knows it for the heart, the pulmonologist knows it for the lungs. Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ.
Where are our health departments, our health insurance, our medical associations? It would have been their duty to be vehemently against the lockdown and to stop it and stop it from the very beginning.
Why do the medical boards give punishments to doctors who give people exemptions? Does the person or the doctor seriously have to prove that oxygen depravation harms people? What kind of medicine are our doctors and medical associations representing?
Who is responsible for this crime? The ones who want to enforce it? The ones who let it happen and play along, or the ones who don’t prevent it?[..]It’s not about masks, it’s not about viruses, it’s certainly not about your health. It is about much much more. I am not participating. I am not afraid.
[..]You can notice, they are already taking our air to breathe.
The imperative of the hour is personal responsibility.
We are responsible for what we think, not the media. We are responsible for what we do, not our superiors. We are responsible for our health, not the World Health Organisation. And we are responsible for what happens in our country, not the government.”
explains why mandatory mask wearing is a dangerous precedent
